Cities around the globe have been planning and building social housing projects for decades. Focused on maximizing the number of units, the quality of dwellings is usually overlooked. Generally, certain typologies have driven the way we design social housing. For instance, a top-down planning philosophy—or a military planning philosophy—is evident in many projects. This method of approaching social housing usually leads to the design of endless rows of depersonalized dwelling units. No attention is given to the quality of life nor to the community aspect of such spaces.
Most of these schemes are built in rural areas—far from cities and job opportunities—making them socially isolated, dehumanizing, and unsustainable. Changing our approach to the design of social housing, will ultimately create more sustainable communities.
An excellent example of successful Social housing is Goldsmith Street, in Norwich, England. The street is a high-density social housing scheme by Mikhail Riches. The project re-imagines social housing as an opportunity to create a highly efficient, economic, community-driven fabric within the city. The Passivehaus design of dwelling units drastically reduces fuel bills for tenants. Communal gardens and planted alleys allow for safe areas for children to play and for residents to engage in social activities. The design enhances the wellbeing of occupants and establishes a strong community.
Other examples of successful social housing include Savonnerie Heymans and Le Lorrain by MDW Architecture. The designs focus on creating a variety of spaces to accommodate different family needs. In addition, each complex houses a children’s playground and areas for events and social gatherings.
As architects, we work to sustain our communities. We are obliged to design good spaces that promote a healthy living. In successful housing projects, residents build an emotional ownership of the place, they connect to it, they love it, they maintain it.
